It seems to me this is fairly clear cut evidence that prior knowledge, if not complacency or even aiding & abetting in, providing false information to the public. Which for me, being a man who uses critical thinking, begs a serious question - if the British courts (from which the American court system evolved from) having reviewed the evidence find that the BBC lied and had prior knowledge of events on 9/11 - then what else was/is a lie? What really happened on 9/11? Who was/is truly responsible for what happened on 9/11. And, the biggest question of all, Why?
Posted on: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 00:30:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015