I’m not saying this is the case but lets cut through the fluff of this story. Even if the suspect is a balding white male in his 40s, who really benefits from this alleged attack? “White America”? No, the NAACP and the rest of the race hustlers benefit immensely. The evidence is in the article, while they admit that no one was hurt and the building only sustained minor damage the majority of the article goes into the lynchings, beatings, and other horrors that occurred in the Jim Crow south of the early 20th century. They take something that harmed no one and compare it to one of the most vile and divisive periods in American history. Why do that? Especially when the suspect is at large and his motives are unknown? It is done in order to revive the division. This is why when I ask “qui bono?” or who benefits, I see this as a soap box for the NAACP to stand on. Now again, this is just my though, if someone had really wanted to be “racist” and get back at the NAACP, why not Molotov Cocktail the building? Why not the barber shop as well that was full of black people right next door? If someone really wanted to they could have done serious damage to life and property that day, but they chose to just “char” some things to show their racist outrage? I’m willing to bet that the suspect will not be caught because he is most likely working for the NAACP or some other race hustling organization. Once you accept that not all white people are racist against blacks it allows you to consider this position.
Posted on: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:01:50 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015