JUST WONDER WHY PEOPLE CAN’T RATIONALLY DISCUSS REQUIREMENTS IN THE CONSTITUTION? It seems that people for years have pushed a presidential candidate even though they are not eligible to be president. We have a president that is a Muslem. Foreigners tend to “pamper” or “gift” their homeland over the wishes of America when they are not natural born citizens. Our forefathers of the Constitution was very wise in setting the premise of being a US citizen and a natural born citizen. Example: Our president gave 1+ million to the Muslem Brotherhood, etc. etc. - THE FEDERALIST PAPERS back up the Constitution. The presidential candidate must have two parents that are natural born or both must be naturalized before the birth of the child. - Thought this statement from an older article would be of interest to some people: "Cruz, however, showed an interest in not allowing the issue to fester. He did the same thing during his 2012 Senate campaign by openly admitting that his father, Rafael Cruz, fought alongside Communist leader Fidel Castro during the Cuban Revolution. His father fled the island in 1957, before Castro came to power, and reportedly became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2005. (Ted Cruz was born before 2005). This has nothing to do with we want to honor him for standing for America.
Posted on: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 05:02:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015