Judicial elections are frequently criticized for allowing - TopicsExpress



          

Judicial elections are frequently criticized for allowing high-rolling campaign donors to influence the judges deciding major cases. But the judicial appointment process is no panacea either: According to a Center for Public Integrity investigation, appointments to the states’ top courts are often based on who you know at least as much as on what you know. Read what reporter Rachel Baye has found after examining the appointment process in dozens of states:
Posted on: Thu, 01 May 2014 11:19:54 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015