MOON LANDING HOAX? To the reader, this video clearly explains that in the 1960s we had magnification technology that could take a HI-RES image right down to 3 inches from 100 miles up. That fact is mentioned FOUR times in this video. https://youtube/watch?v=zS2ivujwo14 3 YES 3 INCH resolution from 100 miles is mentioned @26:43, @37:31, @42:20-7, and @ 51:07 The fact that the spy agency NRO has placed dozens of these UNMANNED SMALL SATELLITES in orbit around the earth suggests they have at least ONE orbiting the moon as we speak. And the fact that they should be able to share HI-RES images from 100 miles up from the lunar surface up to a 3 resolution where are no clouds or atmosphere begs the question ... why is NASA feeding we the sheeple lo-res images of Apollo landing sites in 2014? Why do we get WOW, incredible amazing HI-RES images from MARS and really SHITTY images from the former, the six Apollos landing sites? MARS WOW blogs.voanews/science-world/files/2013/12/Grotzinger-1-pia17594-br2.jpg MOON Apollo landing sites ~ these images are shit when you realize what could be done in the 1960s. nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/584392main_M168000580LR_ap17_area.jpg For a demonstration of the technology available in the 1960s, which did not change much until google earth applied it.... Watch this: https://youtube/watch?v=zS2ivujwo14&feature=youtu.be&t=43m56s
Posted on: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:23:14 +0000