So, I now feel compelled to resume my efforts to shed light on this OPPT issue people have been excited about. I knew nothing about it days ago, but if you know me you know that I like to get to the bottom of things and do thorough research, so here are my findings, the first few being conceptual and philosophical, and the second half being factual/material/legal. Hopefully Nat Both and Severyn Agga, who were in the initial conversation, would also be interested to read and maybe respond to my findings. And Youri Alexandrovich, of course... 1. On the legal forclosure – The great Tolstoy described laws as “rules, made by people who govern by means of organized violence, for non-compliance with which the non-compliant is subjected to blows, to loss of liberty, or even to being murdered”. Laws restrict our liberty by making us act, or refrain from acting, regardless of our wishes. The methods used by the state to enforce its laws are those of compulsion: the ultimate power of the law is the coercive power of the state. It is a venal compact by which superior tyrants have produced the countenance and alliance of the subjugated. Thus, the perpetuation of law does not really depend on its internal coherence, but the mechanisms through which it is enforced to benefit the lawmakers and the elites: the monopoly of force and the willingness for citizens to accept laws due to the fear of the repercussions they may suffer, or the benefits they may be recipients of, if they didnt. In essence, the law is not equal for all, but we all know that... What Im trying to get to is that it doesnt matter whether a legal filing were to “legally” foreclose the corporate state apparatus, but whether those laws can and would be enforced by that same apparatus. Since we know that the corporate state is not going to enforce though its coercive means a legalism that doesnt serve their interest, I think that the legal findings are absolutely irrelevant. Laws have never deterred the powerful to break them at their own convenience and with near total impunity. 2. On the nature of the corporate state – Equally, I think that the most important thing to realize is that in order to liberate oneself and ones society/community from the corporate state entity, it is absolutely not necessary to use the very mechanisms established by that entity. One of Einsteins most famous quotes is that “You cannot dismantle a system with the same mentality that created it” (Im quoting from memory, may be a bit different...). The only thing that would be required for the corporate state to collapse is for the people subjugated by its coercive legal apparatus to simply stop adhering to it on a mass scale. The corporate state is fully aware that if such were to happen, they would not have enough coercive power (in the form of army/police/taxman etc.) to continue enforcing them... hence why the legal apparatus is such a brilliant apparatus! It allows the herd to subjugate itself, doing much of the states work for it. 3. On the consequential illusion of being free – I believe it to be very dangerous to promulgate the idea, which I believe is an illusion, that we are now “free” from the corporate state because of a legalism that will never be enforced. It is likely to create an attitude of complacence and apathy that would be counter-productive as it will not radically challenge the corporate state apparatus!!! It will allow people to simply be comfortable in the notion that they have been liberated, without having to fight for it, which is the only way I believe (based on enormous historical evidence pointing to this almost “fact”) true liberation can be achieved. Now, lets sink our teeth into the meat of the OPPT 4. UCC Filings – The OPPT makes a big deal about it having legally foreclosed global state corporate entities legally through the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) mechanism, which is often used by corporate entities and individuals to secure collateral. The problem here is that each state has its own set of laws regarding UCC filings and, more important, these states filings have absolutely no jurisdiction over foreign entities and countries unless they have holdings within the state the documents were filed. One of the trustees, Heather Ann Tucci Jarraf was an attorney in Washington State, she also has a trucking company operating out of Washington State and, presumably, she’d be doing her filings in Washington State. Therefore, if any of the companies or countries she’s foreclosing on have assets in the state, she might be able to secure the debt via a UCC filing but, for any and all entities not operating in the state, not holding assets in the state and not residing in the state, her filings are nothing more than wasted paper, and wasted time. 5. Compensation in Gold for all citizens – Picture 107,255 (107,255,000 kg) metric tonnes. That is the amount of gold that the OPPT claims will be doled out to every single citizen on the planet (About 5 billion dollars worth per person). The problem is that there isnt even that much gold on the entire planet! Even with the highest estimates of gold availability in the entire world (bbc/news/magazine-21969100), including that which has not yet been mined (minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/gold/), there wouldnt be nearly enough to even scratch the surface of the proposed number. 6. The supporting evidence that is provided to make the case is less than convincing. The secret document that is supposed to be the final report of the foreclosure investigation (scribd/.../PARADIGM-DOCUMENT-FROM-THE...) could be entirely made up, and I think it is. It has spelling mistakes that no serious financial firm would make. I could not find registration of the Treasury Finance AG firm in the Swiss chamber or commerce website (swissfirms.ch). And its sooooo easy to forge a document like this. 7. The Authorization Lead named is Karl Langenstein, one of the three trustees of the Trust alongside Charles C. Miller and Heather Ann Tucci-Jaraff. Langenstein is a known fraudster who fled to Panama after stealing millions of dollars from his victims. There is currently an international arrest warrant out for him (beobachter.ch/.../anlageschwindel_justitia.../) Charles Miller is another known fraudster which regularly engages in falsification of documents and currency to acquire property illegally. You can read more about him here: americannationalmilitia/same-fertilizer.../ 8. The one, key document that is not posted is the actual Trust Document. Laws surrounding the formation of trusts exist, state by state and, whenever a trust is formed, there’s a Trust Document that explains the purpose of the trust, the beneficiaries, the terms of the trust and the trustees are also named. Without this document, you have nothing more than a conversation. There is no such document anywhere that I could find, not even on the trustees blog, through which they have made available numerous other documents to prove their case. All such documents are to be considered invalid and useless unless there is an actual Trust Document.
Posted on: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:41:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015