So, all posts and stories and whatnot have been pre-scheduled due to my weekend with the boys. (No emails, no FB, no nonsense...) However, please excuse this break in my weekend of fun for this notice of latest liberal lunacy that just CAN. NOT. WAIT. until Monday... John Hinkley Jr, who shot James Brady (along with Ronald Reagan - president at the time - and some other folks) in March 1981, a shooting that Brady survived, but put him -permanently- in a wheelchair, and a shooting in which Hinkley was found not guilty by reason of mental defect may be charged with James Bradys death. Brady died this week at the age of 73. Let me say it again just to make sure you get what Im sayin... John Hinkley Jr may be charged for the murder of man he shot in 1981 who died at the age of 73 - this week. 33 year AFTER the shooting and after being found not guilty of attempted murder. Do not get me wrong... Hinkley is 8 shades of crazy and is definitely where he belongs, but HOW can he be charged for the murder of someone who he has already been found not guilty for attempting to murder them? Not saying the double jeopardy thing and not defending Hinkley - I just dont get how you can be found not guilty of attempting to murder someone and then be charged with murdering them with the same bullet you were found not guilty of attempting to murder them with 33 years ago... **I think I just went cross eyed**f Heres my spur of the moment thought on it... We cant let the poster boy for gun control die of natural causes! I know! Well charge someone for his shooting death, it only took 33 years to kill him! Im beginning to think the Liberalism is a form of mental illness cliche (even though it is the opinion of at least one psychology dude) is getting less and less cliche... js Thoughts?
Posted on: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 23:38:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015