Stefan Chornopysky shared a link.Дмитро Сінченко Conflict of interest, or their coincidence? War Ukrainian Putin is on various fronts. Someone in arms protecting our land from saboteurs, terrorists. Some depict this struggle in the media. Some financial support and those and others. However, there are always those who, abusing his official position, profiting and the public, and the public, and the international aid and financing. Corruption is the main enemy today is not only our military, but also Ukrainian each person. And at the same time, it is - the main ally of Putin. This is the main pillar of power built into it and its predecessors System. Therefore, the fight against corruption system - this is one of the fronts of the war for the independence of Ukraine. In our country there are a number of organizations involved in the fight against corruption. And most of them have formed a joint working group to develop anti-corruption legislation (Emergency care reform package). Recently at the discretion of the public and experts to discuss was presented a draft law on principles for preventing and combating corruption. The new legislation would create a special preventive anti-corruption body that will monitor the issue of combating conflict of interests of officials. This collegial body composed of five members who will supervise the actions of public officials. In addition, the bill provides penalties for favoring private interests over the duties of public servants. According to the new version of the bill, all declarations of civil servants will be submitted online. Officials declare not only property and wealth, but also their own interests. In particular, indicate - the members of which political party they are, which shares owned, which previously worked with anyone with ties and more. All these data are available for a large audience. For non declaration or false entail administrative liability (several thousand fine and disciplinary action, including a deprivation of life). All returns will be checked. Who shall do with opposition to his decision? Perhaps those who already have this conflict of interest. law of Ukraine On Principles of Prevention and Combating Corruption defines conflict of interest as a conflict between personal property, non-property interests of the person or persons close to her and her official powers, the presence of which could affect the objectivity or impartial decision-making, and to commit non committing or acting in the exercise of authority granted him. So, the official feels a conflict of interest whenever he is offered a bribe. Do you think that outweighs the interest? ... Is not it better would be to avoid the conflict of interest at all? And is it possible? Let us think of who and what we are working on a public service. Most officials go work for the state because they have their protege (relatives, godfathers, matchmakers, friends, lovers, etc.). They go into low-paying jobs deliberately, because they know that they are provided with career development at least to the level of their patrons know that this job is stable, they know, what they can earn unofficially. Secrets of the profession they always tell them senior comrades. The second category of officials are entrepreneurs. They are, after the hard tyranny of bureaucracy will feel, understand how you can earn on a particular post, buy it, and fully abusing official position to hit listed for the seat money. Social activists and idealists. They go into the civil service in order to serve the state, benefit to society, to implement useful reforms and initiatives. Their money can not buy (except that for very large). Their motivation is primarily in glory and recognition. There are very few. Lets be honest. Is it enough for us idealists to take all or at least most of the jobs in the country? Hardly. Even if we take only the most important, without which the decision will not be accepted nor implemented. Can we know with absolute certainty that a person who claims to be a post, is an idealist and not take bribes? No. Then lets frankly not equal to them, and those whose motivation is primarily financial issues. So as to make the officials who are going to make money, do not take bribes? The most common thought is raise all wages and harsh penalties. But in fact it turns out that this method does not work. How not raised salaries of officials, they still continue to. And with increased penalties, increased and fee because growing risk ... Why the term corruption is present only in the public sphere, and not in private? Because the private owner is interested in profit, and he did not hide. For this, he hires managers not by familial kinship, and not for financial reward, but on merit. After all, these managers have to make them money and increase their profits. The best way to fight corruption, in my opinion, it first - to tie remuneration to the official results of its work. If the service of the state apparatus is not provided for a fixed amount and a percentage of the revenue side of the budget, officials are interested in the growth of this part. If the state is only a single tax, for example - 10% of the income of the citizen, the state apparatus will be interested in the growth of incomes. Then will the need for effective managers, because only they can make money for the state , then the problem disappears overstaffing, pay only for those who actually perform the work, and without whom it can not be done. Secondly , to make public all information about the use of public finances, in particular, the income of civil servants. Transparencies should be all registers property Then disappear excessive bureaucratization process. State refuses to extra features, and therefore of permits, certificates, registrations, mizhkabinetnoho football and other artificial bureaucratic obstacles. All this will be unnecessary, because any abuse is not possible to hide, so make this no longer happens. Thirdly , completely move to cashless payments. This step will track any financial transaction and avoid any financial crimes. In this case it will be possible to refrain from taxation. This will be the end of the shadow economy. White economy becomes profitable, and its rules - all clear. Manage their own accounts and adhere to fiscal discipline will not only all businesses, but all households. Fourthly , it is necessary to ensure competition supervisory bodies. But not, as suggested in the draft presented as competing authorities with similar control functions. For specific job receive taxpayers money is only one particular structure or man - without any overlaps. Competing must state controlling bodies of the public. They must simultaneously monitor use of public funds and, if the work of public initiative is more effective than the state and its management be invited to work for the existing management body. Access to information for all is the same, but the government structure will have adequate financial support for system operation. Community Initiatives will have budgetary provision may even work on a voluntary principle or seek self finance their activities, but will be enough motivation for their work. And all the results of investigations have equal validity with an official government agency. Fifthly , it is necessary to ensure the election of judges, transparent judicial system, widespread use of jury trials and civil courts. This is the final chord in building systems without corruption . The following article will try to tell you what steps you need to take to ensure the functioning of the system. Dmitry Sinchenko for online publication sin4enko.jimdo/2014/06/28/%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BA%D1%82-%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2-%D1%87%D0%B8-%D1%97%D1%85-%D0%B7%D0%B1%D1%96%D0%B3/
Posted on: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:05:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015