The 1962 IGC Report by its name alone is only a report; and the pertinent confusion is this – since when can a mere report containing proposed recommendations or demands, as some people put it, evolve into a legally binding international Treaty, Agreement, Contract, or Convention? In the 1963 Malaysia Agreement, were the 20-Points and 18-Points, or alternatively how many of both were clearly spelt out in the same? Find out too exactly how many of the individual 20-Points and 18-Points were actually incorporated into the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, the latter of which is evidently masqueraded by the Constitution of Malaya. By all international standards, is the IGC Report not at best only a Memorandum of Understanding with no legal force of law?
Posted on: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:47:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015