Three things. 1) The atheist professor is angry, offensive and rude from the get go, not the best way to start a debate 2) the fact that just a mere Muslim guy stands up to have a debate with an atheist scientist/professor of his level says a lot about about the truth and strength of what he believes in 3) Hamzas arguments and conclusion are much clearer, deductive, firm and conclusive than Laurence krauss, he just appeared at times weak in his responses and did not really have a proper conclusion. He went astray from the point of almost every argument and just said a bunch of stuff which didnt have great point. Just reflects a true atheist. Every time you have an argument with an atheist person, they never stick to the point, they are always good at making irrelevant points or points that does not really address the original argument/question. The way I see it in terms of accepting something you question until there are no more questions left... using logic, morals and where appropriate- evidence.
Posted on: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:56:11 +0000