We have tried to contact MyMovingReview several times and have not had any response, on this review, we do not have enough information on this review to investigate the circumstances...With that said we contacted our legal department and this is what they pulled up on this MyMovingReview company. There are charges against them in UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR FAKING REVIEWS APPARENTLY THE OWNER OF MYMOVINGREVIEWS.COM IS RUNNING A SCAM SO PLEASE NOT NOT USE THIS COMPANY FOR ANY INFORMATION FOR IT MAY BE FALSE (FAKE) WE RECOMMEND YOU USE THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU (BBB) THIS SITE IS NOTHING BUT A SCAM....... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12262-GAO MOVING AND STORAGE, INC., d/b/a Neighbors Moving and Storage, MBM MOVING SYSTEMS, LLC, COLONIAL VAN LINES, INC., FATHER & SON MOVING AND STORAGE, AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC., and NATIONWIDE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. MARTIN PANAYOTOV, STOIL ANDREEV, XPRESS MOVERS, LLC, ADVANCED INTERACTIVE, LLC, and WORLD MEDIA GROUP, LLC, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER March 12, 2014 O’TOOLE, D.J. This case arises out of the defendants’ operation of the moving company review website MyMovingReviews. The individual defendants, Martin Panayotov and Stoil Andreev, are officers or owners of the corporate defendants, Xpress Movers, LLC, Advanced Interactive, LLC, and World Media Group, LLC. The plaintiffs, all corporations providing moving services, allege that the defendants deleted positive customer reviews of the plaintiffs and deleted negative customer reviews of Xpress Movers in order to gain market share, all the while maintaining that the website was neutral in its operation. The plaintiffs assert various tort and statutory claims arising from the alleged conduct, and they also claim that the defendants committed copyright and trademark infringement by using content and logo designs taken from the plaintiffs’ websites on MyMovingReviews without permission. Defendant Panayotov moves to dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing primarily that he is immune from suit under the
Posted on: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:07:24 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015