You know people with cancer are dying through lack of knowledge !!! If this is a subject close to your heart and I believe there to be many of you just read this ...... I have had personal experience of using Clarks ideas to cure terminal lung cancer (given 6 weeks to live by the specialist doctor). This was NOT caused by smoking, having been a non-smoker for life but was cause by asbestos.. The one star reviewer who claimed that Clark denies smoking is a factor is wrong. Clarks main hypothesis is that toxins (all sorts of chemical poisons are listed in her books) open you up to invasion by a whole variety of possible parasites / pathogens / bacteria / fungi. These all act together to promote the cell overgrowth we see as cancer. Cigarette smoke contains toxins and also paralyses the lungs normal cleansing mechanism, so smoking makes you vulnerable to all sorts of other pollutants and pathogen invasions. This reviewer may not be aware that skin cancer is also promoted by toxins ... some of which were found in sun creams (and many have been quietly withdrawn from commercial porducts). He may also not be aware that orthodox treatment is (a) very very expensive (b) will cause serious side effects that weaken a patients normal ability to fight disease (c) is only able to help a minority of cancers (Hodgkins, child leukemias, some skin cancers but not others) (d) they use statistical cheats to make exaggerated claims for success. e.g. by lots of scanning they now catch cancers in the early stages so the patient will survive (say) 7 years whereas the previously they did not discover the cancer until (say) 5 years later.. so they lasted only 2 more years ...BUT THERE HAS BEEN NO IMPROVEMENT TO THE ACTUAL DATE OF DEATH. Yet they would claim to have extended survival time. (e) by diagnosing precancerous states as cancer .. it is true that 30% would go on to develop cancer but, by claiming the other 70% as cancers and treating them they have a built in success rate. This has been done with DCIS of the breast Hulda Clark is ONE person who has made some great progress in treating these serious diseases and is being attacked by the combined weight of a rich medical establishment. I was a serious sceptic of her ideas (because I had a conventional scientific training) until I discovered she had correctly understood the reasons for the high level of liver cancer amongst Chinese farmers. The Chinese now use a her dicoveries to treat this cancer. They use their local herbs and may also use other chemicals to clear the pathogen (which invades from snails found in the paddy fields). This was reported in The New Scientist (this publication probably did not realise the basic ideas had come from Dr Clark, otherwise they might not have reported this success) I am so glad some medics/scientists are not blind and are prepared to use simple and effective treatments. It cost me less than £400 in total for herbs and a simple electrical zapper. Much of the treatment involved cleaning up the personal environment ... so I was avoiding many dangerous modern products (like amalgam fillings, flouride, metallic copper and certain cleaning products). I think vested interests are frightened not because it fails but because it works, it is cheap and is a threat to their super profits!! Come on guys and girls wake up and smell the coffee... If this topic and the word cancer scares you please please cleanse your body and get rid of every possible harmful toxin in there ! The saying goes does it not PREVENTION is better than CURE ! Now theres something for you all to think about ?
Posted on: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 10:09:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015