yet another of those moments when you realise your reply is like as long as the thread and wonder if the other partys even open to objective discourse seeing as you seem to have come across as opposing camp -- and really, even if they .are. as open as youd happily give em credit for, the sheer length of the resultant comment(with bonus screenshot even) is like totally imposing on their post/wallshare so....to post or not to post lol. ve totally done it before but imposing like so is not a habit id like to perpetuate in myself into the sub/unconscious level. but where does the line between that making me a considerate person and an opinionless doormat (dumb sheeple, complacent lapdog, insertderog.nameforuslurkers here..) stand? when a person shares a side-charged status, article or post, how open are they being for commentary and-or discussion? when is it just expression, and when do they really want perspective(s)? and why is it so hard to put forth a human-to-human view before immediately being seen as opposite camp? dislike of rowdiness and rudeness does not necessarily mean i dont oppose, unless the eventual conclusion is to be that opposition-representation is necessarily disruptive, rude and foolofself-making and then we might really be doomed lorh..? meandering thoughts and augmented fragments.. -- I think I might need a coffee, if im actually considering an emotionless dictionary definition as a defense against a statement accusation of a word with negative connotations being used as sensationalistically sh|t-stirring, when im usually against such myself and yet am personally moved toward pointing out the debt of basic respect and civility for those negatively affected by the immaturity of the days invasion..
Posted on: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:00:51 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015