It is more respectful to use Muhemmed instead of Muhammad as - TopicsExpress



          

It is more respectful to use Muhemmed instead of Muhammad as spellings for the sacred name of Sayyadi Rasul Allah (sm). Pl try to follow the ones which are closer to adab. There are no sharia defined spellings of Arabic names in English, so we must adopt those spellings which are respectful and have no element of beyadabi in them. In Quran, there is a full event explained that when Jews would address Sayyadi Rasul Allah (sm) and would say “Raina”, which can have two meanings , one being pl look at us and the other which meant that you are our Sheppard (Naooz u billah). Allah (swt) revealed verses in Quran and blocked the use of word Raina for Rasul Allah (sm) and Muslims were told to use word “Unzurna” which has no element of beyadabi. The spellings “Muhammad” were created by the British deliberately and they would pronounce it in such a manner that it becomes extremely beyadab. I cannot even write them… To defeat their sinister designs, which Muslims do not understand, we should change the spellings to “Muhemmed” which take away the beyadabi aspect. Pl note that Omer can be written with O and also with U. Similarly, Usman or Osman. Both are correct. There are NO defined spellings in English for Arabic names, so do not make it a issue. But be careful where adab becomes a issue. Jazak Allah to all of you. These are sensitive matters of adab, NOT of argument or debate.
Posted on: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:10:22 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015