Still time to have a crack at this, it should be easy for the dissenters. The challenge promoter has to wrap it up by the end of the month (July). If you want my advice dont bother with the $30,000 challenge you will lose - there is just too much scientific evidence for AGW. The $1,000 challenge is winnable. All you need to is provide scientific evidence of any kind that proves AGW is not real. I interpret this as meaning you just have to falsify one line of scientific evidence for AGW. Examples I can think of CO2 cools the atmosphere not warm it, glaciers are not receding, sea levels are not rising, global average temperatures are not increasing. dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.au/p/1000-global-warming-skeptic-challenge.html
Posted on: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 23:38:58 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015