Data Sumerian scribes wrote 6000 years ago that ET s from the planet Nibiru dictated history, astronomy, geology and technology for clay tablet and captions on monuments. The clay tablet and monument inscriptions tell the history of Earth history better than any other explanation. The inscribed history makes more accurate predictions of facts we can measure than any other theories we have. Theories are hypothetical formulations, words and mathematical models to account for what we saw, see, and will see. Theories say what to look for in the evidence of the past, present and future. Theories generate hypotheses or guided guesses. In science we also test the null hypotheses–we look for data would disprove our hypothesis. If we go by the principle of PARSIMONY, also known as Occam’s razor–which explanations best account for all the data–and skip the least ooparts (data and artifacts other explanations can’t account for)–, Sumerian accounts of our history do best. Consensus–what most people think–determines social reality. But consensus doesn’t predict the chemical composition of asteroids or the shape of the landmass beneath the Antarctic icepack the way ancient Sumerian tablets do. We’re left with alternate explanations of much. Enjoy the theories consensus explanations of our leaders and masses. But wonder, and ask what ideas to cut with Occam’s razor from consensus theories and to replace with better theories. And the Sumerians, as you’ll hear in today’s program, had better explanations than our religious, academic and mass consensus ever did. We grasp the elephant of reality from varying perspectives. See them all and get a clearer picture of the beast and the blind who generalize from their particular hold on the it to the nature of the whole creature and its context. An explanation or theory that most parsimoniously (simplest, with least words, numbers, adumbrations) accounts for the all the data and makes more accurate predictions of future behavior as well as past accumulated data helps us understand better than one that uses more words and symbols and must exclude exceptions to work. Thus, for example, Copenicus’s heliocentric explanation of the apparent movement of planets takes less math than Ptolomy’s epicycle system, though the latter also can predict apparent planetary movement. Philosopher Neil Freer writes: “I am convinced of the correctness of Sitchin’s thesis [of our Alien origins] and of Sir Laurence Gardiner’s [of how the line of the Alien Royalty hybrids still rule the world as our power elite]are the only explanations which contain no inexplicable elements, no contradictions and in which all the facts dance together in total consort. Our species’ internecine violence, a product of Babel-factoring for crowd control that has carried through to great wars and the religious mayhem of crusades, jihads, inquisitions and persecutions and not intrinsically of human nature. The Catholic Church, a continuation of the fear of the god Enlil [Yahweh] type of subservient religion came into ascendance by an alliance with the gradual assimulation of the Roman empire and adopting its practices. Suppression of our true history through promulagation of the Hebrew Old Testament forgeries done to make Enlil their single monotheistic diety affected a racial amnesia and the ancient Sumerian culture was forgotten and only rediscovered in the late 1800s. Military and political controllers have suppressed the knowledge and data about alien presence on this planet by denial and ridicule.” [Colaw, 2004]
Posted on: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:31:54 +0000