EQUALITY UNDER LAW FOR NORTH AMERICA’S HUMAN-BORN POPULATION - TopicsExpress



          

EQUALITY UNDER LAW FOR NORTH AMERICA’S HUMAN-BORN POPULATION Good morning: Unbeknownst to America’s modal population, each of the state governments that collectively comprise North America as a country is a corporate entity and, poignantly over America’s most recent decade (in accordance with preeminent edicts of the “United States Supreme Court’s” consistent majority) they share closer co-equal “Personage” with other corporations, whilst exercising similar preemptions over its citizenry (i.e., its customers). Whereas said entities’ life source is money (rather than blood) they share closer familiarity—and sympathies—most preponderantly with the wealthiest members of said “citizenry.” To said effect said governments’ agencies (and their courts of law) favor their wealthiest “few” “citizens” over their modal populations—to the extent of virtually shunning the latter, circumventing contexts of lawful adjudication—marginalizing them into regulation by forced arbitration or regulatory agencies (whereby “Customary Rules of Evidence” are “waved”—circumventing constraints of the United States Constitution, Regular Rules of Order, Procedural Due Process under Law, or Equal Treatment under Law that are Mandatory in State or Federal Courts of Law—making said agencies tantamount to dictatorial vigilante tribunals, immune to virtually any other State or Federal oversight jurisdiction—especially inclusive of immunity from traditional courts of law) whereby under said illusory circumvention Administrative Law Courts have notoriously proved themselves nefariously biased, i.e., favoring said agencies and other major “non-government” corporate entities whose preference is to circumvent legislated or Constitutional constraints so as to relegate all corporate (“persons’”) malfeasance to contexts of financial transactions, whereby (human-born) state or corporate agents themselves have been legislatively immunized from prosecution and their abuses remain free of litigation. The undersigned therefore extends this petition to the United States Senate, House of Representatives and to the President of The United States of America: Whereas said circumstances structurally undermine explicit provisions of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, this petition rightly requests there to be a partition of time and circumstance of incumbency of at least two (2) full terms whereby said federal or state agents’ incumbency has been severed from all regulatory authority over corporate entities conducting business in industries under said agents’ official purview. Moreover, whereas scores of thousands of United States Citizens invest and manifest sufficient faith in The United States of America to typically expend twenty (20) or more years modally so as to become competently educated, and as such become, e.g., licensed physicians; notwithstanding incurrence of financial debt and collateral risks (typically exceeding $200,000—plus accrued interest if said sum is acquired thru student loans) or forfeiture of all other worthy personal or professional business or personal (life-choice) alternatives, so as to dedicate one’s lifetime endeavors in pursuit of a medical career as one’s vocation and livelihood; whilst paying otherwise unimagined sums in premiums for malpractice or administrative claim risk insurance, and minimums of $2000 monthly in office rent; more for personnel, equipment, or supplies, etc.. They should not suffer any risks, however, whereby any Corporation, or State board of licensure can undermine said physician’s (nor any other medical professional’s) reputation or livelihood or revoke or suspend their license so as to enable any government or corporate agency or their agents to pursue any personal, ideological or any other non-statutory vendetta. Nor should any corporate or state agency nor any of its governing agents enjoy any personal or professional civil or criminal immunity nor any option for circumvention (e.g. thru State Administrative Law Courts) of state or federal civil or criminal law court oversight pursuant to any state or federal law or executive order (especially whereby federal jurisdiction shall in any way, as a consequence of said immunity or circumvention, not have preemption under this context over any preemptions or statutes asserted by any state). Nor should any corporate or state agency or its agents be availed any circumvention whereby a physician’s U. S. Constitutionally mandated rights under its 1st 4th or 14th Amendment(s) are precluded from said physicians’ (or other medical licensees’) benefit thru circumstances of coerced penury (such as when said penury results subsequent to malfeasance or vexatious prosecution by any Controlling Authority whilst ostensibly exercising licensee oversight) nor should said circumventions be effected thru assertions by any corporate or state agent or agency privilege accorded thru any state-legislated provision. Nor should any corporation, state agency, its agents or employees be exempt from any order by the United States Department of Justice in its investigative due diligence under said contexts of professional licensure (especially under contexts of physicians or nurses); nor should any State Agency Judgment or order resulting in suspension or revocation of said professional licenses be exempt from final jurisdiction by the United States Department of Justice, when physicians or nurses at issue credibly assert administrative malfeasance whereby Constitutional provisions of equal treatment or equal due process under state or federal law has or have been violated or whereby said claimants credibly assert said malevolent actions have been undertaken or abetted in any potential violation of any U.S. Constitutional 1st , 4th , or 14th Amendment provisions (whereas consequences of any such malfeasance imposes or facilitates preemptions of U.S. Constitutional equal protection mandates to American citizens across state borders pursuant to competent lawful full exercise of their professional or vocational training, education or expertise as their livelihood, or that undermines their lawful interstate commerce thru subversions of 14th Amendment mandates for equality and equal treatment under federal or state law pertaining to said citizens’ lawful liberty, as citizens of the United States of America, to competently engage in their livelihoods professionally anywhere in the United States of America, its territories or indeed, therefore, anywhere else in the world). Respectfully George Thompson, Sr.
Posted on: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:14:27 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015