I HAVE SAID IT BEFORE AND I WILL KEEP SAYING IT UNTIL YOU HEAR ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We the People can pass any law or constitutional amendment we want, the Supreme Court can overrule it!!!!!!! GITMO Activists, Prison Reformers, Religious Leaders, Net Neutrality Advocates, Campaign Finance Reform Advocates, Pro-Life, Pro-Choice, NSA Haters, Senator Bernie Sanders, LGBT community, Father’s Rights, ACLU, President Obama, House Speaker John Boehner, Senator Ted Cruz, Democrats, Liberals, Independents, Libertarians, Rand Paul, Tea Party, Snowden, and GOP have ALL MISSED THE ISSUE. The constitution never INTENDED to allow 5 of 9 people on the Supreme Court to have absolutely immune power to decide issues of THE utmost importance for all time, attaching unimpeachable stare decisis!!!!!!!!! “One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark dgjeep.blogspot/2014/05/article-iii-judicial-power-is-defined.html If you think you have issues with Citizen United, Hobby Lobby, Roe v. Wade or any other particular ruling from the Supreme Court... YOU HAVE NO IDEA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Take our COUNTRY back from 5 Black Robed Royalist persons on the Supreme Court and their Article III Brother persons legislating from the bench with self-servingly asserted absolutely immune as the would be Kings that THINK they can do no wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is not necessarily a Democratic or Republican issue. “We the People” can pass into law any CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT or constitutionally authorized “necessary and proper” ex industria statute law. The Supreme Court can OVER RULE IT!!!! I quote the AGAIN, in 2014, prophetic MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting in the Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 26 (1883): “Constitutional provisions, adopted in the interest of liberty and for the purpose of securing, through national legislation, if need be, rights inhering in a state of freedom and belonging to American citizenship have been so construed as to DEFEAT THE ENDS THE PEOPLE DESIRED TO ACCOMPLISH, WHICH THEY ATTEMPTED TO ACCOMPLISH, AND WHICH THEY SUPPOSED THEY HAD ACCOMPLISHED BY CHANGES IN THEIR FUNDAMENTAL LAW” (capitalization added for EMPHASIS). WE HAVE no enforceable rights in this country, but especially so in Family Law. Misandry is RAMPANT in the Family Law Courts of the United States of America and the developed world. Family Law is the one area of the LAW where the overwhelming majority of “We the People” meet the legal system for the FIRST and ONLY TIME. 99% of the “We the People” just do not know!!!! “We the People” have lost faith in Government because there is NO “reckonability” in the law. Article III, stare decisis is what to date has cost us ~646,392 Civil War Dead, 150 years of racial unrest post-Civil War. Don’t let McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission Docket No. 12-536, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310, District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) or Kahn v. Kahn 21 F.3d 859 (The domestic relations exception) corrupt the rights of “We the People” to do what they believe to be “necessary and proper” for the next 150 years. Just read the full prophetic text of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting in the Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 26 (1883), I quote just the introduction here: “The opinion in these cases proceeds, it seems to me, upon grounds entirely too narrow and artificial. I cannot resist the conclusion that the substance and spirit of the recent amendments of the Constitution have been sacrificed by a subtle and ingenious verbal criticism. It is not the words of the law, but the internal sense of it that makes the law; the letter of the law is the body; the sense and reason of the law is the soul. “Constitutional provisions, adopted in the interest of liberty and for the purpose of securing, through national legislation, if need be, rights inhering in a state of freedom and belonging to American citizenship have been so construed as to DEFEAT THE ENDS THE PEOPLE DESIRED TO ACCOMPLISH, WHICH THEY ATTEMPTED TO ACCOMPLISH, AND WHICH THEY SUPPOSED THEY HAD ACCOMPLISHED BY CHANGES IN THEIR FUNDAMENTAL LAW” (capitalization added for EMPHASIS). Imagine where “We the People” would be if the war weary victorious “We the People” had been able to prevail in 1883 and eliminate segregation at its inception rather than appease the defeated degenerate Confederacy. We have NO right of REDRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Judicial sophistry of “absolute immunity” creates “absolute power” to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of “We the People’s” unalienable rights under color of law... a “fantastic or delusional” scenario. “As long as rulers are above the law, citizens have the same type of freedom that slaves had on days when their masters chose not to beat them.” To hear the Article III Judiciary tell it, “We the People” “intended sub silentio to” to trade the “King can do not wrong” for the malice, corruption, dishonesty, sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity of the malicious or corrupt judges, the malicious or dishonest prosecutor, the knowingly false testimony by police officers, the corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid actions of all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of inalienable rights under color of law. Take our COUNTRY back from 5 Black Robed Royalist self-servingly asserted absolutely immune would be Kings that THINK they can do no wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Judicial Independence was originally postulated to altruistically SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUSTICE in the face of malice, corruption, sincere ignorance and conscientious stupid. Judicial Independence as “absolute immunity” today COVERS UP malice, corruption, sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity EVERYDAY!!!!!!!!!! dgjeep.blogspot/2013/12/if-there-is-only-one-thing-you-read.html dgjeep.blogspot/2014/01/judicial-independence-was-originally.html dgjeep.blogspot/2013/06/the-supreme-courts-confirmation-bias.html HOW COULD OUR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, AND OUR ITS ACTORS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, AVOID STRICT ABSOLUTE LIABILITY FOR INALIENABLE SUPREME COURT CERTIFIED, BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS? We the People have fallen under the despotic[7] spell of the self-servingly constructed[8]excess of power[9] in the Supreme Court that has constructed[10] ABSOLUTE POWER[11]from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for denial of INALIENABLE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS(Criminal 18 U.S.C. § 241 & 242 and Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985 ) by malicious or corrupt judges(Bradley v. Fisher, supra, 80 U. S. 335, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 57 (1967) Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978)),[12] the malicious or dishonest prosecutor Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 428 (1976), [13] the knowingly false testimony by police officers (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)),[14]corrupt, malicious, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[15] actions[16] of federal, state, local, and regional legislators (Bogan v. Scott-Harris - 523 U.S. 44 (1997)Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367, 372, 372-376; Amy v. Supervisors, 11 Wall. 136, 138)[17]and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid[18] actions of all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who (spouses) were integral parts of the judicial process (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)) [19] acting under color of law to render ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION[20] of inalienable rights under color of law. Article III Judicial Power is defined and limited by an act of We the Peoples Congress. It does not require a CONSTITUTIONAL amendment. It is time that We the People assert our control, via an act of congress, of the Supreme Court: with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make (Article III, Section. 2, § 2)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! dgjeep.blogspot/2014/07/what-supreme-court-has-done.html
Posted on: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:41:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015