I think from time to time about that old song line: War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing. So it turns out does Gregory Daddis (professor at West Point). In our American world, war (as a first go-to option, not a last one) is a given. No one really stops to ask the simplest, most basic question: war, what is it good for? Recently, Daddis did in an op-ed in the LA Times. Someone should bring him to Washington to put a little fresh air in a very stale room. Tom As the United States charges once more into war, little debate has centered on the actual utility of war. Instead, policymakers and pundits have focused their comments on combating the latest danger to our nation and its interests as posed by Islamic State militants. War has not left us with a more stable international environment. And it seems increasingly incapable of deterring future war. - In late August, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel claimed Islamic State was an imminent threat to every interest we have and that the sophisticated group was “beyond anything weve seen.” With few dissenting voices, either in Congress or in the American media, U.S. air forces plunged again into the unstable region of the Middle East. The only remaining deliberation, it seemed, was whether boots on the ground were necessary to dismantle and defeat this new threat to democracy and freedom. For well over a decade — one might suggest over multiple decades — the United States has been engaged in war, yet so few in the public sphere seem willing to ask, as a Vietnam-era hit song did: “War, what is it good for?” It seems plausible to argue that war is a phenomenon increasingly serving itself rather than any durable political goals. Military theorists from an earlier age sought to place war firmly in its political context. In the early 1800s, Carl von Clausewitz, while acknowledging that wars results should never be regarded as final, still spoke of war performing a political purpose. A century later, Britains Basil Liddell Hart suggested that strategists should look beyond war to the subsequent peace. But what if peace never comes? What if war only engenders new enemies and new threats? Moreover, war, as an instrument of policy, seems increasingly to be losing its decisive edge. latimes/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-1005-daddis-utility-of-war-20141005-story.html
Posted on: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:00:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015