Intelligent Design and Evolution ring a bell. Communities - TopicsExpress



          

Intelligent Design and Evolution ring a bell. Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness. (Albert Einstein, 1934) The existence of the unknown creates the possibility of free will. I have difficulty seeing your vision in daily events. I suppose from my perspective there is no such thing as Freedom nor freewill it is simply a matter of relative cultural independence framed by nature. If each cultural foundation codex (genetic, (con) textual authority, and exemplar-leadership (messianic) templates) consistently, constantly informs the behavioral variance spectrum of its adherents/culture there will be marginal or no change to the nature of human experience because what is discovered is discovered through the cultural codex lens and will be reinterpreted even at times completely counter to ‘fact’ to align to that vision. Intelligent Design and Evolution ring a bell. The definition of Other, Peace, Justice, Freedom, Freewill,… the same for all cultures even after how many years is it now? This continuing lack of agreement on key definitions coming to an end despite clear attempts via UN and other bodies to come up with human rights constructs particularly for women? If what you were saying is true how is it countries including Russia are trying to push back even these hard fought definitions of women’s place in society – surely the ‘new’ knowledge upen which the original decisions were made guarantees change remains – surely it is obvious? Brunei Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Muizzaddin Waddaulah ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Haji Omar Ali Saifuddien Saadul Khairi Waddien given his new knowledge is a ‘modern man’ and is not framing a Nation in a seventh century barbaric construct? Even a ‘doctorate in philosophy and humanities’ and yet? If the following was a truth: Human history is fundamentally different from the trajectory of a pebble tossed from a cliff. History is the process of uncovering the unknown and responding to this new knowledge. surely by now humanity would have seen the light. The trouble is adherent/cultures can be staring straight at it but ‘it’ may actually reinforce the adherents/cultures position it does not exist. Knowledge simply does not matter old or new – it is not in the end the individual who decides it is the culture within which they are situated. Although it is said the pen is mightier than the sword my view is that in the end the mightiest swords own the pens. There is plenty of old and new knowledge in terms of enabling the maximized independence of a person so they can achieve a flourishing life in security and peace - yet what is happening? What happened on Egyptian streets? What is happening on many others - security improving or not? Free will: Free there is no such thing. Will is a culturally defined artifact. The relative will you apply to anything will be squarely founded in a cultural behavioral variance and be applied to that which the culture has enabled – yes there may be outliers (more enabled for good or evil in some cultures than others) and you may be one of them. My view is you are promoting a dangerous ideology – why do you think this is? It has to do with the fact you are seller of false hope that ‘knowledge’ will save humanity from its cultural self, somehow the individual will be able to achieve an impossible state ‘free’ which diverts political attention from the real problem humanity faces what cultures can inform despite the ever present liberal moderate situated within a secular or religious construct – I would hope you are right but alas I do not think so. You propose critical thinking will ride across the hill and save the day, my view is such thinking will lose the day because you are not dealing with cultural constructs whose codex allows such reflection internally let alone with outside entities. Pretence is not a subsitute for actually changing the codex and therefore changing cultural outcomes. “FREEDOM!” Freedom to do What, To Whom, For Whose benefit. Consider when children are massacred in a dormitory, children are …… and this comes consistently constantly from a particular culture historically and current tell me can you point to the actual divide between the influence of culture and an independent self deciding action based on ‘free’-‘will’? Can We Replay History? Thursday, November 10, 2011 decisions-and-info-gaps.blogspot.au/2011/11/can-we-replay-history.html
Posted on: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:36:22 +0000

Trending Topics



y" style="min-height:30px;">
Good morning BAMBNF FAMILY! We are making a plea. A lot of

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015