Its funny how our crooked council tells us the reason they gave the waterrfront to the ABM was financial loss due in large part to the renovations they had done in the last 2 years,well if you remember 1 of the buildings they had done was the one I was in and now if you look at it its been gutted and we the taxpayer is paying for it,they say they spent thousands on renovations only to have the ABM tear it down at our expense,they say the ABM is to pay $20,000 per year minus upkeep,maybe I am stupid but if the ABM wants to tear down what the taxpayers have payed thousands to renovate because they want to renovate it to their liking how is that considered necessary upkeep,shouldnt whatever the ABM wants to renovate be on their dime not ours,the news has to stop chasing 1 Rob Ford and concentrate on 7 of them here,I mean when was the last time these people were honest with us.
Posted on: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 23:52:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015