Social Science Position Paper on Reactions: When speaking about the nature of the human being, its a consensus amongst social scientist of the chemical makeup of the human being, only its subjects are confused about their relative role in reacting to social injustice. Males have a chemical called Testosterone which regulates muscle and anger reaction. This is the male species way to protect its community if an injustice takes place. If natural reaction is enabled in anyway, the males would be useless in protecting the community. An Imperialist/racist government would have an agenda which shouldnt be surprising to us to indoctrinate the so called Niggers/African Diaspora people into a behavioral orientation of being non-violent. Gandhis non-violent approach is not surprising since he was openly a racist, which seems surprising that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. loved this man after he conducted research on him. But the question that would come to my mind was why didnt his research not discover that his hero was racist? Could it be that Dr. King sold out to a shadow Masonic order? This question was raised because the Masons celebrate his birthday every year, why would they do this to a non-member? Logic would suggest a crooked government wouldnt want its subjects to respond with violence, because they might get hurt and change might be the result. Social Scientist conduct research regularly on primates and they understand clearly how the species operate. If a primate would have privileges that another primate doesnt have, the other primate would get angry. So youre being set up that your natural response of anger and violence in all areas of activity is wrong and should be handled in the criminal justice system. This is an attempt to implant fear in you so you could go against your natural instincts to respond to injustice with retaliation. This is happening in the public school system where they are teaching children that their natural reactions to respond to another child who hits or mistreat them is an illusion and this zero fighting policy is nothing but a political move to brainwash children that there natural instincts is unnatural and uncivilized. Im not suggesting that more violence should occur when others are wronged. Im suggesting that diverse forms of retaliation on a higher intellectual plateau should occur to correct injustice. If violence is necessary, so be it. Perhaps there should be units of influence so that a variety of diverse responses should occur. This would be consistent with Malcolm Xs perspective by any means necessary. We argue too much among us about what agenda is superior to another, perhaps we should hit the system on many angles up, down, left, and right until it weakens. In a unfair system like this, all actions should be given careful forethought because individuals amongst you have been indoctrinate to think like what they programmed you to think. And the system is in charge, so if you behave against your racial programming, you will be labeled and criminalized. The solution I suggested is for us to get our own community where we can look over the concerns of our own people so we can begin to heal, teach and live among each other so we can learn to trust and love one another again. This will take some patience and some time to build a infrastructure but it must be done. Until then, we will live in fear because our enemies will target us randomly so they can kill our innocence so they spark anger in the community so they can usher Martial Law in all states and this could be the predicate for their New World Order. Written by Sifu/Mahdi/Social Reformer (Mike))
Posted on: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 02:26:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015