This article brings up some good points and some good questions. I like the fact that the author of this article looked up tactics of certain left-wing guerrillas of the past. That is good because there were some real smart ones in times past. My guess is that the war of resistance against the NWO occupiers will not happen until the reality of that occupation sinks in to most people. This author is right that the occupiers control the media and the discussion of all such things and label those who even think of this conspiracy theorists. Lets face it, most people out there are living their little lives and wonder what we are on about, what sort of nutty paranoia we are obsessed with. They think this is just one more presidential administration even if it is a less appealing one. Lets face it; it is not real yet. If you can make it go away by turning off the TV, radio, or web, its not real yet. It will get real when people can no longer carry on their normal lives. It will get real when really weird stuff happens, not on TV but in your home town. Three Percent is a good way to express the percentage of activists who know what is to come and are preparing for it. That is the percent that knows now that it is real. The rest dont know yet. Forget convincing them. It wont work. They think we are nuts. Life will have to teach them. Then, we have to be ready to deal with those shocked and unready people. We have to know what to do with them. It could go down like this. One fine day something happens that disrupts normal life. It could be like when a hurricane hits or some other natural disaster like a mud slide or fire. People are taken by complete surprise or at best have a day or twos warning from the weather man. It could be that moment when a family throws their belongings in their car to drive away from something, never to return to their home and having no idea where they are going to go. It could be that moment when a person went away on a trip and has no home to go home to because the worst happened. People could end up stranded or fleeing with a few possessions in a bag that were frantically packed. Or, perhaps they are in their homes, but now there is no where to go. Perhaps it will be a sudden announcement on TV about a major governmental change and a whole new set of laws. People may just walk around in a dazed shock. Guerrilla war can take many forms. It could be units in the woods with guns, or it could be more of a French Resistance style thing. It could be a network of cooperating cells. It could be a long march. To go by history, you would have to look at what happened in other countries. Germany after World War I: They lost the war. They were under the dictate of the Treaty of Versailles which was quite punitive. Their army was demobilized and guns taken. They were forced to make payments on a huge war debt. The Kaiser fled, and the government was replaced by a puppet government that was obedient to the victors. The Social Democrats were the dominant party. Conditions for poor and workers was harsh. Two extreme movements grew. The Communists increased in size and many factory and low level workers joined them. The German nationalists formed freikorps (not unlike American militias). There were many violent collisions between the communists and the freikorps. Most little people tried to stay out of the way. Hitlers party came a little later. It was made up of veterans of the former German Army for the most part. Hitler himself was one of these as he had been a corporal. As time went on, the remnants of the Kaisers government favored Hitler. The conflict here was a combination of politics and political parties combined with street battles with the opposition. It was a battle of political parties which went on until one became most dominant, which as we all know, ended up being Hitler. It would take too much time to say why the Nazis won, but it is enough to say the nature of the war was politics mixed with street fights. One point can be made that it was also because military personnel, including the intelligence agencies of that country, backed Hitler and gave him a tremendous advantage. The lesson here is that you need remnants of the former government in your movement if you have any chance of succeeding. Maos Long March: A long time ago I read a book about this. It is an interesting but true story. China was a feudal country back then run by a bunch of war lords. The Japanese were trying to invade at the time, so their troops were around. There were nationalist forces run by Chiang Kai Check, but they were managed rather poorly. There was a newly formed bunch of communists of which Mao was in a leadership role. Mao and his communists were in a particular city doing political work. They were not quite military yet. The enemy surrounded the city one day in order to crush them. Somehow Mao and his red friends slipped out and began to travel across the huge country of China. They were a roving bunch. As they went along, they gathered peasants and poor people who wanted to escape the war lords. They were just regular people. They had to learn soldier stuff on the fly. They slowly developed into an army which grew and grew. Mao ended up being an expert on guerrilla warfare. He learned by doing. This would be a case of people reacting suddenly to a situation. They were just running away from a bad situation. Mao had to make fighters out of them. Mao also had to work with no funding to speak of. These were desperately poor people joining up with him. They owned no property, just the shirts on their backs. Mao was the type of person who could make a guerrilla army out of a bunch of homeless people. Before the two sides are formed for any conflict, they have to be defined. Who is us? Who is them? I do not think the sides are clearly defined enough yet. In these two historical examples, the lines were very clear. I do not think they are as clear here in the US yet.
Posted on: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:25:23 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015