YOU MUST UNDERSTAND! READ THIS! NO MORE! YOU REALLY WANNA KNOW THE TRUTH ITS SCARY BUT YOU NEED TO WAKE UP AND READ THIS NOW! I was under a spell of programs to keep me pre occupied to just not give a damn. September 11th was A inside job ordered by George W. Bush JR. To gain access to military fund in the 100 millions to go to Iraq and steal there oil. Blaming a man named Osama Bin Ladin, the founder and head of the Islamist militant group (CIA) al-Qaeda, was killed in Pakistan on May 2, 2011, shortly after 1:00 am PKT. Former British Foreign secretary, Robin Cook said: Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan Bin Laden worked for the CIA years before 9/11, 9/11 was a scam created by top notch manipulators and professional liars. CIA is involved in so much scandals that it would blow your mind. The FBI are dirty, cover up after cover up. There is so much evil and greed in our government that no one can be trusted. I just dont understand why people wont sit down and read about are failing country and the people in charge are ruining us and no one will listen! I can tell you this Thermite a Chemical only manifested by the government was found on ground zero. Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of metal powder fuel and metal oxide. When ignited by heat, thermite undergoes an exothermic oxidation-reduction reaction. Most varieties are not explosive but can create brief bursts of high temperature in a small area. Its form of action is similar to that of other fuel-oxidizer mixtures, such as black powder. Thermites have diverse compositions. Fuels include aluminium, magnesium, titanium, zinc, silicon, and boron. Aluminium is common because of its high boiling point. Oxidizers include boron(III) oxide, silicon(IV) oxide, chromium(III) oxide, manganese(IV) oxide, iron(III) oxide, iron(II,III) oxide, copper(II) oxide, and lead(II,IV) oxide.[1].\ They set us up, they lied to us for there secrete plan agents are humanity. Evil has access in our government on a leading scale. Skulls and Bones is the demonic understanding of the leading in of the New World order proclaimed by George W. Bush SR on 09/11/91 This is the video George Bush Sr. New World Order Live Speech Sept 11 1991 URL: youtube/watch?v=byxeOG_pZ1o . I know the Devils games and he has planned this time and awaited this time for a long time. He is satisfied in making people Judge one another. He has all of his Legion on earth Demons that have been here for 1000s of years. In and out of everyone thats been brainwashed by the perfection and prestige job of our innocent loving government. The government in fact are a legion of demonic forces that are trying to breakdown our system and put us and the hole world in anarchy. Obama passed unconstitutional bills that are very bad. Executive order was just updated on SEP. 30 2013 He has Total control over this country in fact legally he can have anyone arrested for no reason at anytime and put into a pro long detention camp. Do you Want Proof that its time to wake up? Here you go : National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2012[2] is a United States federal law which besides other provisions specifies the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense. The bill passed the U.S. House on December 14, 2011, the U.S. Senate on December 15, 2011, and was signed into United States law on December 31, 2011, by President Barack Obama.[3][4] The Act authorizes $662 billion in funding, among other things for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad.[5] In a signing statement, President Obama described the Act as addressing national security programs, Department of Defense health care costs, counter-terrorism within the United States and abroad, and military modernization.[6][7] The Act also imposes new economic sanctions against Iran (section 1045), commissions appraisals of the military capabilities of countries such as Iran, China, and Russia,[8] and refocuses the strategic goals of NATO towards energy security.[9] The Act also increases pay and healthcare costs for military service members[10] and gives governors the ability to request the help of military reservists in the event of a hurricane, earthquake, flood, terrorist attack, or other disaster.[11] The most controversial provisions to receive wide attention were contained in subsections 1021–1022 of Title X, Subtitle D, entitled Counter-Terrorism, authorizing the indefinite military detention of persons the government suspects of involvement in terrorism, including U.S. citizens arrested on American soil. Although the White House[12] and Senate sponsors[13]maintain that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) already grants presidential authority for indefinite detention, the Act states that Congress affirms this authority and makes specific provisions as to the exercise of that authority.[14][15] The detention provisions of the Act have received critical attention by, among others, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, and some media sources which are concerned about the scope of the Presidents authority, including contentions that those whom they claim may be held indefinitely could include U.S. citizens arrested on American soil, including arrests by members of the Armed Forces.[16][17][18][19][20] The detention powers currently face legal challenge. (BUT still approved and being used!) Indefinite detention without trial: Section 1021[edit] The detention sections of the NDAA begin by affirm[ing] that the authority of the President under the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists (AUMF), a joint resolution passed in the immediate aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, includes the power to detain, via the Armed Forces, any person, including a U.S. citizen,[13][21] who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, and anyone who commits a belligerent act against the United States or its coalition allies in aid of such enemy forces, under the law of war, without trial, until the end of the hostilities authorized by the [AUMF]. The text authorizes trial by military tribunal, or transfer to the custody or control of the persons country of origin, or transfer to any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.[22] Addressing previous conflicts with the Obama Administration regarding the wording of the Senate text, the Senate-House compromise text, in sub-section 1021(d), also affirms that nothing in the Act is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force. The final version of the bill also provides, in sub-section(e), that Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States. As reflected in Senate debate over the bill, there is a great deal of controversy over the status of existing law.[17] An amendment to the Act that would have replaced current text with a requirement for executive clarification of detention authorities was rejected by the Senate.[23] According to Senator Carl Levin, the language which precluded the application of section 1031 to American Citizens was in the bill that we originally approved in the Armed Services Committee and the Administration asked us to remove the language which says that U.S. citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section.[24] The Senator refers to section 1021 as 1031 because it was section 1031 at the time of his speaking. Requirement for military custody: Section 1022 All persons arrested and detained according to the provisions of section 1021, including those detained on U.S. soil, whether detained indefinitely or not, are required to be held by the United States Armed Forces. The law affords the option to have U.S. citizens detained by the armed forces but this requirement does not extend to them, as with foreign persons. Lawful resident aliens may or may not be required to be detained by the Armed Forces, on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States.[25][26] During debate on the senate floor, Levin stated that Administration officials reviewed the draft language for this provision and recommended additional changes. We were able to accommodate those recommendations, except for the Administration request that the provision apply only to detainees captured overseas and theres a good reason for that. Even here, the difference is modest, because the provision already excludes all U.S. citizens. It also excludes lawful residents of United States, except to extent permitted by the constitution. The only covered persons left are those who are illegally in this country or on a tourist visa or other short-term basis. Contrary to some press statements, the detainee provisions in our bill do not include new authority for the permanent detention of suspected terrorists. Rather, the bill uses language provided by the Administration to codify existing authority that has been upheld in federal courts.[27] A Presidential Policy Directive entitled Requirements of the National Defense Authorization Act[28][29] regarding the procedures for implementing §1022 of the NDAA was issued on February 28, 2012, by the White House.[30][31] The directive consists of eleven pages of specific implementation procedures including defining scope and limitations. Judge Kathrine B. Forrest wrote in Hedges v. Obama: That directive provides specific guidance as to the Scope of Procedures and Standard for Covered Persons Determinations. Specifically, it states that covered persons applies only to a person who is not a citizen of the United States and who is a member or part of al-Qaeda or an associated force that acts in coordination with or pursuant to the direction of al-Qaeda; and who participated in the course of planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners (see p. 11–12).[32] Under procedures released by the White House the military custody requirement can be waived in a wide variety of cases.[30] Among the waiver possibilities are the following:[33] •The suspects home country objects to military custody •The suspect is arrested for conduct conducted in the United States •The suspect is originally charged with a non-terrorism offense •The suspect was originally arrested by state or local law enforcement •A transfer to military custody could interfere with efforts to secure cooperation or confession •A transfer would interfere with a joint trial Actions from the White House and Senate leading to the vote[edit] The White House threatened to veto the Senate version of the Act,[12] arguing in an executive statement on November 17, 2011, that while the authorities granted by the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists, including the detention authority...are essential to our ability to protect the American people...(and) Because the authorities codified in this section already exist, the Administration does not believe codification is necessary and poses some risk. The statement furthermore objected to the mandate for military custody for a certain class of terrorism suspects, which it called inconsistent with the fundamental American principle that our military does not patrol our streets.[12] The White House may now waive the requirement for military custody for some detainees following a review by appointed officials including the Attorney General, the secretaries of state, defense and homeland security, the chairman of the military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence.[34] During debate within the Senate and before the Acts passage, Senator Mark Udall introduced an amendment interpreted by the ACLU[16] and some news sources[35] as an effort to limit military detention of American citizens indefinitely and without trial. The amendment proposed to strike the section Detainee Matters from the bill, and replace section 1021 (then titled 1031) with a provision requiring the Administration to clarify the Executives authority to detain suspects on the basis of the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists.[36] The amendment was rejected by a vote of 60–38 (with 2 abstaining).[37] Udall subsequently voted for the Act in the joint session of Congress that passed it, and though he remained extremely troubled by the detainee provisions, he promised to push Congress to conduct the maximum amount of oversight possible.[35] The Senate later adopted by a 98 to 1 vote a compromise amendment, based upon a proposal by Senator Dianne Feinstein, which preserves current law concerning U.S. citizens and lawful resident aliens detained within the United States.[38] After a Senate-House compromise text explicitly ruled out any limitation of the Presidents authorities, but also removed the requirement of military detention for terrorism suspects arrested in the United States, the White House issued a statement saying that it would not veto the bill.[39] In his Signing Statement, President Obama explained: I have signed the Act chiefly because it authorizes funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, crucial services for service members and their families, and vital national security programs that must be renewed...I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists.[40] In 2008, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 struck much of the existing text in section 1076. That same section had been what Naomi Wolf talked about when she commented to Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!: You don’t make it easier for the President to declare martial law, as we just did with the 2007 Defense Authorization Act.[3] The revised section of the law, section 1068 had one amended section had multiple parts with the same exact text. These sections (bolded to show the similar parts) read as follows: Amendment to Section 1076 of the law (2008) `Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law`The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other :means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it--`(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United Stateswithin the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, :privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and :the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that :right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or`(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes :the course of justice under those laws.In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have :denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 For other uses of HR4986, see HR 4986. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 is a law in the United States signed by President George W. Bush on January 28, 2008. As a bill it was H.R. 4986 in the 110th Congress. The overall purpose of the law is to authorize funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, for military construction, and for national security-related energy programs. In a controversial signing statement, President Bush instructs the executive branch to construe Sections 841, 846, 1079, and 1222 in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the President. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (H.R. 2647, Pub.L. 111–84, 123 Stat. 2190.) is a law in the United States signed by President Barack Obama on October 28, 2009. As a bill it was H.R. 2647 in the 111th Congress. The overall purpose of the law is to authorize funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, for military construction, and for national security-related energy programs. The Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (or MOVE Act) is Subtitle H of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (H.R. 2647, Pub.L. 111–84, 123 Stat. 2190.) and was signed into law in the United States signed by President Barack Obama on October 28, 2009. The overall purpose of the law is to help military serving overseas and citizens who live abroad vote in U.S. elections. Most provisions apply to the November 2010 elections. A notable exception is the requirement (in Subsection E) that requires states to allow a UOCAVA voter to enter his/her address or other information relevant to the local election jurisdiction and receive a list of all candidates for Federal office in that jurisdiction.[1] However, implementation of the act has been spotty, with only 15 states having fully implemented it. In California, only 15 of its 58 counties failed to comply with the law, resulting in military absentee ballots not being counted as they were received too late. Yet, 90 percent of absentee ballots sent to American civilians living abroad are returned and counted, compared to 2/3rds of absentee ballots mailed by overseas military personnel.[2] In a report by the Overseas Vote Foundation released in January 2013, 21.6 percent of military voters did not receive their ballots, and 13.8 percent of military voters tried to vote but couldnt The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (H.R. 6523, Pub.L. 111–383), is a law in the United States signed by President Barack Obama on January 7, 2011. As a bill it was originally H.R.5136 in the 111th Congress and later co-sponsored by Representative Ike Skelton as H.R. 6523 and renamed. The overall purpose of the law is to authorize funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, for military construction, and for national security-related energy programs. This Bill is huge and also a parable with secrete information in the large small print to trigger certain programs that consist of ways to kill civilians that resist. Go to this URL if you would like to read the bill URL: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2011
Posted on: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:17:29 +0000