In The Supreme Court Of Nigeria An Extract Of The Event That Unfolded On 5th Of May, 2014 Content (1) Introduction (2) Life Event Of The Case In The Supreme Court of Nigeria (3) Burning Questions That Require Immediate Answers (4) Supreme Court Rule Of 1984, Order (8) Rule (6) Introduction It is the position of Anti-Corrosive Vanguard that a valid dismissal of Suit no SC./69/2011 traceable to An Alleged Case Withdrawal by an unauthorized former lawyer can only be effective where All The Parties had consented to the withdrawal of the appeal else the case shall be re-listed and be heard on merit in the subsequent hearing date. Order 8, Rule 6, Number (4) Of The Supreme Court Rule Of 1985 As Amended. This is crystal cleared in view of the fact that the Defendant (Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited) was not served the notice of case withdrawal by Dr. Tony Ukam, and most importantly the Defendant (Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited) has not consented to the alleged notice of case withdrawal as provided for in Order 8, Rule 6, Number (1) Of The Supreme Court Rule Of 1985 As Amended. Life Event Of The Case In The Supreme Court of Nigeria Below is an extract of the event that unfolded in the Supreme Court Of Nigeria between Comandclem Nigeria Limited and Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited to the effect that Dr. Tony Ukam never serve and consent with the legal counsel of the Defendant on The Alleged Notice Of Case Withdrawal. Happy reading. The Presiding Judge: Honourable Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen Dr. Eyimofe Atake, Have you been served with the notice of withdrawal of this appeal filed on 24th of March, 2011? Mobil Oil: Dr. Eyimofe Atake No my lord. We haven’t. We are not aware. We haven`t been served any notice of withdrawal of this appeal, my lord. Comandclem Nigeria Limited: Rev. Jesse-Daniel Onuigbo ESQ. My lord, I am very surprise. I am not aware of the alleged notice of case withdrawal of this appeal, my lord. My client never authorizes Dr. Tony Ukam to file the alleged notice of withdrawal, my lords. To be continued. Burning Questions That Require Immediate Answers (1) Have all the parties consented to the notice of withdrawal allegedly written By Dr. Tonu Ukam to necessitate SUIT NUMBER SC./69/2011 being dismissed BY HONOURABLE JUSTICE ONNOGHEN, J.S.C.? (2) Did Dr. Tony Ukam serve the legal counsels of the Defendant (Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited) a copy of the alleged notice of case withdrawal as provided for in the Supreme Court rule of 1985 as amended to empower Justice ONNOGHEN, J.S.C. to dismiss the case? Supreme Court Rule Of 1984, Order (8) Rule (6) 6. (1) An appellant may at any time before the appeal is called on for hearing serve on the parties to the appeal and file with the Registrar a notice to the effect that he does not intend further to prosecute the appeal. (4) If all the parties do not consent to the withdrawal of the appeal as aforesaid, the appeal shall remain on the list, and shall come on for the hearing of any issue as to costs or otherwise remaining outstanding between the parties, and for the making of an order as to the disposal of any sum lodged in Court as security for the costs of appeal. Name: Yusuf Nurudeen (B. Sc, AAT, ACA) Head Office Address: CCNL Zonal Headquarters, Position: CCNL Marketing Manager Number 4, Ogudu Road, Ojota, Lagos State. Ondo State Office: Position: CCNL Ondo State Manager No 32. Oba-Adesida Road, Opposite Airtel Office, S.O. Area, Akure. Mobil Number: +2347032522248 CCNL Twitter Name: twitter/Comandlem_Nig CCNL Facebook Name: Comandclem Patentees CCNL Corporate Facebook Address: facebook/COMANDCLEMNIGERIALIMITED CCNL Corporate Website: comandclemonline CCNL Forum: comandclemonline/forum/index.php?
Posted on: Thu, 08 May 2014 11:53:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015